Recently during a City Council workshop meeting, I mentioned that exploring a potential relationship with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding the possibility of leasing Dana Peak Park is one of my budget priorities for the coming year. Because there has been discussion in the community about this topic, I want to take a moment to explain why it is on my priority list and where things actually stand.
First, the City of Harker Heights is not currently taking control of Dana Peak Park, and the City is not entering into any lease agreement at this time. What I mentioned during the meeting was simply that exploring whether a lease could even be possible is a priority worth examining.
The reason this matters to me goes back to the input our residents have given us. In 2017, the City conducted a broad community visioning effort that included public sessions, visits with civic organizations, and conversations with residents at community events. Hundreds of citizens shared their thoughts about what they wanted to see in Harker Heights’ future. One message came through very clearly: residents wanted more family activities and more opportunities to enjoy the natural assets that make our community unique.
One of the features that citizens consistently pointed to was Lake Stillhouse Hollow and the recreational opportunities surrounding it. In fact, one resident even described our community as “Lake City USA.” As part of those discussions, Dana Peak Park was frequently mentioned as an important recreational asset that residents would like to see more accessible and available.
Because of that input, the City began conversations several years ago with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to understand what it would take for a city to lease and operate the park. At that time, the Corps was not interested in leasing the park. In later years, as federal recreational funding became more limited, the Corps approached the City about the possibility of a lease. City staff carefully reviewed the proposed lease terms and identified several provisions that would need to be revised before the City could even consider moving forward. Those issues exist at the federal level, and since the early 2020s our staff has worked with our federal representatives to explore whether those revisions could be made. To date, no changes have occurred. If the lease terms cannot be revised, then there is simply no path forward for the City to lease Dana Peak Park. If revisions were ever made that made a lease feasible, the next step would not be immediate action. Instead, the issue would come before the City Council and would include public hearings and additional citizen visioning sessions to determine what residents would want the park to provide.
From my perspective, there are two guiding principles that would be critical in any discussion. First, the park should ideally be open 365 days a year so that residents can enjoy it year-round, rather than closing for extended periods as it currently does. Second, the operation of the park should be financially neutral, meaning that operational costs would be offset by gate fees rather than creating a financial burden on city taxpayers.
Recently, a petition has circulated that suggests the City is preparing to take control of the park for commercialization or that its natural beauty is somehow at risk. I want to be clear: those claims are false and very misleading. The City has not entered into a lease, staff have not been authorized to enter into a lease, and no decision about operating Dana Peak Park has been made.
Petitions are an important way for citizens to share their opinions, and I respect the passion people have for this park. However, it is also important that the conversation be based on accurate information. At this point, the City is simply evaluating whether there is even a viable path forward.
If there ever is a path forward, the decision will be guided by public input and City Council approval. The original interest in exploring Dana Peak Park came directly from our residents, and as Mayor I believe it is my responsibility to listen when citizens express a vision for their community.
I appreciate the strong interest people have in Dana Peak Park and the care our community shows for preserving its natural character. My goal is the same as yours: to ensure that Harker Heights continues to grow in ways that enhance quality of life while protecting the assets that make our city special.
______________________
